Comparison of ensembles of atmospheric dispersion simulations: Lessons learnt from the confidence project about uncertainty quantification

Irène Korsakissok*, Spyros Andronopoulos, Poul Astrup, Peter Bedwell, Karine Chevalier-Jabet, Hans de Vries, Gertie Geertsema, Florian Gering, Thomas Hamburger, Heiko Klein, Susan Leadbetter, Anne Mathieu, Tamas Pazmandi, Raphaël Périllat, Csilla Rudas, Andrey Sogachev, Peter Szanto, Jasper Tomas, Chris Twenhöfel, Joseph Wellings

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Work Package one (WP1) of the EU-funded project CONFIDENCE (COping with uNcertainties For Improved modelling and DEcision making in Nuclear emergenCiEs) is dedicated to uncertainties during the early phase of a radiological accident. More specifically, it consists of propagating input uncertainties through atmospheric dispersion models to generate a results ensemble in which radiological endpoints can be analysed, for example by threshold exceedance of dose reference levels. The first step of any uncertainty propagation study consists of identifying and quantifying input uncertainties. Meteorological data (e.g. wind, rain fields’ forecasts) and source term (i.e. released rate of radionuclides as a function of time) are the key uncertainties during a nuclear crisis. The former was dealt with by using meteorological ensembles. For the latter, several scenarios were designed, from the most simple (a short release with crude perturbations on quantities, height and beginning time) to an ensemble of source terms, designed with the severe accident code ASTEC, including uncertainties. Finally, a significant literature review was undertaken to identify and characterise uncertainties linked to atmospheric dispersion models. Guidelines for ranking uncertainties in atmospheric dispersion were produced (Mathieu et al. 2017). The second step was an uncertainty propagation exercise through atmospheric dispersion and radiological models, for both historical events and hypothetical scenarios. During this stage, participants from eight countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, the Netherlands, Norway and the UK) used the meteorological ensembles and release scenarios to propagate the uncertainties through their operational tools (Korsakissok et al. 2019). The level of uncertainties taken into account depends on the participant; some only propagated the meteorological ensemble, others used Monte Carlo methods to take into account all the identified uncertainties. This exercise led to a tremendous amount of data: fields of atmospheric concentrations and deposition as a function of time, and associated doses, for a large number of simulations. Some lessons learnt relate to dealing with high-dimensional inputs (meteorological ensembles, source terms) and outputs, from very practical issues to more theoretical ones. This abstract aims at presenting a synthesis of the exercise, with a focus on issues related to the analysis and visualization of uncertainties, including statistical and graphical indicators to compare ensemble results.

Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Event19th International Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes, Harmo 2019 - Bruges, Belgium
Duration: 3 Jun 20196 Jun 2019

Conference

Conference19th International Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes, Harmo 2019
Country/TerritoryBelgium
CityBruges
Period3/06/196/06/19

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes, HARMO. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of ensembles of atmospheric dispersion simulations: Lessons learnt from the confidence project about uncertainty quantification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this