Lessons learned from interlaboratory comparisons of bioassay data interpretation

Hans Doerfel*, A. Andrasi, Michael Bailey, V. Berkovski, C. M. Castellani, C. Hurtgen, J. R. Jourdain, B. LeGuen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When a set of bioassay data is given to two different dosimetrists, it is likely that these data will be interpreted differently, that different methods and dosimetric models will be applied and therefore different numerical values will be obtained. Thus, it is important for laboratories dealing with internal dosimetry to undergo performance testing procedures such as interlaboratory comparisons of bioassay data interpretation. Several intercomparison exercises have already been organised at national and international levels. The largest one so far was the 3rd European Intercomparison Exercise on Internal Dose Assessment, which has been organised in the framework of the EULEP/EURADOS Action Group, 'Derivation of parameter values for application to the new model of the human respiratory tract for occupational exposure'. The most important lesson learned from these intercomparison exercises was the need to develop agreed guidelines for internal dose evaluation procedures to promote harmonisation of assessments between organisations and countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)427-432
Number of pages6
JournalRadiation Protection Dosimetry
Volume105
Issue number1-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lessons learned from interlaboratory comparisons of bioassay data interpretation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this