Methodological gaps and opportunities for studying multisectoral collaboration for health in low- and middle-income countries

Douglas Glandon*, Shinjini Mondal, Ida Okeyo, Shehla Zaidi, Mishal S. Khan, Osman Dar, Sara Bennett

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current body of research into multisectoral collaborations (MSCs) for health raises more questions than it answers, both in terms of how to implement MSCs and how to study them. This article reflects on current methodological gaps and opportunities for advancing MSC research, based on a targeted review of existing literature and qualitative input from researchers and practitioners at the 2018 Health Systems Research (HSR) Symposium in Liverpool. Through framework analysis of 205 MSC research papers referenced in a separately published MSC 'overview of reviews' paper, this article identifies six broad MSC question domains ('meta questions') and applies content analysis to estimate the relative frequency with which these meta questions and the research method(s) used to answer them are present in the literature. Results highlight a preponderance of research exploring MSC implementation using case study methods, which, in aggregate, does not seem to adequately meet policymakers' and practitioners' needs for generalizable or transferable insights. The content analysis is complemented by qualitative insights from HSR Symposium participants and the authors' own experience to identify six key methodological gaps in research on MSC for health. For each of these gaps, we propose areas in which we believe there are opportunities for methodological development and innovation to help advance this field of study, including: better understanding the role of power dynamics in shaping MSCs; development of a classification framework (or frameworks) of governance arrangements; exploring divergence of perspective and experience among MSC partners; identifying or generating theoretical frameworks for MSC that work across sectors and disciplines; developing intermediate indicators of collaboration; and increasing transferability of insights to other contexts. Collaboration with researchers outside of the health sector will enhance efforts in each of these areas, as will the establishment and strengthening of pluralistic MSC evidence networks also involving policymakers and practitioners.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)II7-II17
JournalHealth Policy and Planning
Volume34
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The study team would like to gratefully acknowledge the delegates from the Fifth Global Symposium on Health Systems Research in Liverpool, UK (8–12 October 2018) whose active participation and insightful contributions during the skill-building workshop and panel session on MSC methods enriched both of those sessions and informed the development of this article. This article builds upon prior research that was funded by the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (Grant Number: 59838).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Context
  • developing countries
  • evaluation
  • governance
  • health systems research
  • implementation
  • measurement
  • research methods
  • transdisciplinary

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological gaps and opportunities for studying multisectoral collaboration for health in low- and middle-income countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this