Sexual behaviour in Britain: Partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours

Anne M. Johnson*, Catherine H. Mercer, Bob Erens, Andrew J. Copas, Sally McManus, Kaye Wellings, Kevin Fenton, Christos Korovessis, Wendy Macdowall, Kiran Nanchahal, Susan Purdon, Julia Field

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    669 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Sexual behaviour is a major determinant of sexual and reproductive health. We did a National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal 2000) in 1999-2001 to provide population estimates of behaviour patterns and to compare them with estimates from 1990-91 (Natsal 1990). Methods: We did a probability sample survey of men and women aged 16-44 years who were resident in Britain, using computer-assisted interviews. Results were compared with data from respondents in Natsal 1990. Findings: We interviewed 11 161 respondents (4762 men, 6399 women). Patterns of heterosexual and homosexual partnership varied substantially by age, residence in Greater London, and marital status. In the past 5 years, mean numbers of heterosexual partners were 3.8 (SD 8.2) for men, and 2.4 (SD 4.6) for women; 2.6% (95% CI 2.2-3.1) of both men and women reported homosexual partnerships; and 4.3% (95% CI 3.7-5.0) of men reported paying for sex. In the past year, mean number of new partners varied from 2.04 (SD 8.4) for single men aged 25-34 years to 0.05 (SD 0.3) for married women aged 35-44 years. Prevalence of many reported behaviours had risen compared with data from Natsal 1990. Benefits of greater condom use were offset by increases in reported partners. Changes between surveys were generally greater for women than men and for respondents outside London. Interpretation: Our study provides updated estimates of sexual behaviour patterns. The increased reporting of risky sexual behaviours is consistent with changing cohabitation patterns and rising incidence of sexually transmitted infections. Observed differences between Natsal 1990 and Natsal 2000 are likely to result from a combination of true change and greater willingness to report sensitive behaviours in Natsal 2000 due to improved survey methodology and more tolerant social attitudes.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1835-1842
    Number of pages8
    JournalThe Lancet
    Volume358
    Issue number9296
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2001

    Bibliographical note

    Funding Information:
    We thank the study participants, the team of interviewers and operations, and computing staff from the National Centre for Social Research who carried out the interviews. The study was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council with funds from the Department of Health, the Scottish Executive, and the National Assembly for Wales. We thank Sandy Gale for assistance with preparation of the paper. The late Jane Wadsworth made important contributions to survey design.

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sexual behaviour in Britain: Partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this