The present ICRP protection quantitites are seriously flawed. Opposing the proposition.

Alan Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Our debaters have agreed to defend positions that appear to be diametrically opposed; nevertheless, they have acknowledged some common ground. Although it was not explicitly stated, they would no doubt agree that workers and the public are adequately protected by our present system of radiation regulations. Our debaters have overtly agreed that it would be desirable to have measurable radiation protection quantities. Whether or not this is advantageous, or even possible, will depend upon which argument swayed your opinion. The ICRP is presently examining its recommendations and will, over the next few years, update those recommendations. Therefore, the contributions of our debaters will surely be relevant to this process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-87
Number of pages3
JournalRadiation Protection Dosimetry
Volume104
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The present ICRP protection quantitites are seriously flawed. Opposing the proposition.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this